Academic paper in The Journal of Portfolio Management, written by Cliff Adness, Todd Hazelkorn, and Scott Richardson of AQR.
Summary: “A seemingly large amount of stock buybacks in recent years has prompted many to claim that buybacks have come at the expense of new investment. Our latest paper shows why neither the theory nor the evidence supports this view.”
In the article “Buyback Derangement Syndrome,” AQR Capital Management addresses criticisms of corporate share repurchases, particularly the notion that funds used for buybacks could otherwise be invested in business activities that stimulate economic growth. The authors argue that this perspective oversimplifies the issue and does not align with financial economic principles.
Key Points:
Disclosure: Certain information contained herein has been obtained from third-party sources and such information has not been independently verified by ShareholderYield.com. No representation, warranty, or undertaking, expressed or implied, is given to the accuracy or completeness of such information by ShareholderYield.com or any other person. While such sources are believed to be reliable, ShareholderYield.com does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. ShareholderYield.com does not undertake any obligation to update the information contained herein as of any future date.
Except where otherwise indicated, the information contained in this material is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation of such material and not as of the date of distribution or any future date. Recipients should not rely on this material in making any future investment decisions.
asfasdfasdf